• Send us Mail
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Join our Facebook Group
  • Subscribe to our RSS Feed
  • Search Site

Polari Magazine

  • Home
  • Up Front
    • Editorial
    • Clementine: The Living Fashion Doll
    • Polari Safari
    • WTF? Friday
    • Bulletin Board
    • Polari Facts
  • Features
    • Interviews
    • Features
    • Gallery
    • Opinion
    • Heroes & Villains
  • Community
    • Oral Histories
    • Coming Out Stories
    • Relationships
    • IDAHO
    • LGBT History Month
    • Blogs
  • Reviews
    • Books
    • Film and Television
    • Music
    • Stage
    • Visual Arts
    • Classics: Books
    • Classics: Film and Television
    • Classics: Music
  • About
    • About Polari Magazine
    • Contributors
    • Contact

You are here: Polari Magazine / Heroes & Villains / Villains: DC Political lobbies deprive people rights

Villains: DC Political lobbies deprive people rights

04 Jul 2009 / Comments Off / in Heroes & Villains/by Rebel Scum

It is a truth universally acknowledged that the subject of marriage is guaranteed to get one’s knickers in a twist. Look at the Katy Perry video for ‘Hot N Cold’. Now that is a riot in stereotypes. And really, that is what this subject is about: the upkeep of an institutional stereotype. Marriage. It is the current hotcake in US politics.  One only has to look at the school-playground fight currently dubbed ‘the culture wars’ by the right-wingers.

In April, the Washington, D.C. City Council voted twelve to one to recognise gay marriages performed in other jurisdictions. Two groups are committed to countering the work of these Commies and their talk to civil liberties. Reverend Patrick Walker, a DC resident, heads an organisation that represents around 500 churches in the area. (500? DC?  It’s tiny!) Stand 4 Marriage DC, which has links to larger country-wide lobbies, is headed by Bishop Harry Jackson, the owner of multiple homes who only registered to vote in DC this April. The idea, it would seem, is to exploit the black vote, if there can be said to be such a homogenous thing, and divide the city.

DC is an important battleground because it is the seat of government. “The City Council took action on this issue without bringing it to the residents of the District of Columbia in any form or fashion,” according to Walker. “It was almost a back-door kind of thing,” he added, in what was perhaps a Freudian slip. The rhetoric is typical: when a minority looks to be gaining a foothold, spout some vague idea about the will of the people. That’s right: let’s go back to mob rule and flout the principles of democracy.

This is fairly typical fare. The National Organization for Marriage recently launched an ad campaign. It seems the citizens are concerned that the legalization of same-sex marriage threatens their freedom as Americans to impose their values on others. Apparently, churches that do not get behind the law are threatened with losing their tax exemption, and some such stuff. “Religious liberty experts have said that these sorts of conflicts just scratch the surface of what we are likely to see if same-sex marriage becomes widespread,” they claim. Are these people in arrested development? Have they merely not progressed beyond the age of five?

I am not sure what this is doing in the church anyway. This is a civil debate in a democracy and as such it should be secular. I know that eighteenth century legal documents are not the easiest to read, but the first of the amendments to the US Constitution guarantees the separation of church and state. Quibble though they might, if this separation is not guaranteed one is living not in a democracy but a theocracy. You either believe in freedom or you do not. You either believe in equality or you do not.

In the fundamental document in US political history, Thomas Jefferson states, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” The Creator is a wonderfully vague phrase, and one that was added by the Congress and is not in Jefferson’s original draft. It could mean anything, all in all. The point is that it is not a core principle that one can brush aside.

This argument is really about civil partnerships anyway, and to call it marriage just makes it easier for the right-wingers to stir people up. But let’s face it, we’re going to call them marriages. This is what has happened in Britain, where the Civil Partnership bill of 2005 makes a mockery of the American political process. You wouldn’t say that a heterosexual couple joined in a registry office were not married. Let’s just get it out of the realm of religion altogether.

In the end, this not about marriage but about equality. These lobbyists do not believe in the principles that underwrite the US Constitution. Their allegiances lie elsewhere, and their rhetoric is that of the playground.

Links & Further Reading

For a detailed article on Stand 4 Marriage read Adam Serwer’s article on The American Prospect website.

Read about what the National Organization for Marriage calls “the gathering storm”, in an article by Alex Koppelman. If you have thick skin watch the McCarthyite ad, too.

The Political Cortex reports how Jamie Raskin, a constitutional historian, became a champion for same sex marriage by illustrating the separation of church and state.

In Florida, Amendment 2 has been proposed to define marriage as between a man and a woman. Listen to how inclusive Florida 4 Marriage are in their exclusion. This is the voice of the enemy, people.

Barack Obama, appearing on the gay television network Logo, discusses gay marriage.

GLAD Civil Rights Project Director Mary Bonauto explains GLAD’s legal challenge to Section 3 of the Defence of Marriage Act which strips federal rights and protection from same sex married couples.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
Tags: barack obama, national organization for marriage, reverend patrick walker, same-sex marriage, stand 4 marriage dc

Related Posts

Did you like this entry?
Here are a few more posts that might be interesting for you.
Related Posts
Are you a MEGA-gay?
Best American Political Writing 2008 • ed. Royce...
It’s a nice day for a white wedding
The Future’s So Bright I Can’t Bear To Look
Priority Booking
An Open Letter To The Newly-Weds
Ian McKellen on same-sex marriage
Vote for Equal Marriage Rights
This Week In The Same Sex Marriage Debate
Ratings War

Search Polari

Latest Posts

  • Polari Magazine 2008-2014December 3, 2014 - 6:16 pm
  • Tearing Up Their Map: An Interview with LambDecember 2, 2014 - 2:45 pm
  • Future Islands • GigDecember 2, 2014 - 1:41 pm
  • Puppets with Attitude (at Christmas)December 1, 2014 - 6:30 pm
  • The Aesthetic of Voyeurism: Interview with Antonio Da SilvaDecember 1, 2014 - 1:25 pm
  • Broke With Expensive Taste • Azealia BanksNovember 28, 2014 - 3:59 pm
  • Royalty Strutting on an American College Stage: Miss and Mr. Gay ISU 2014November 27, 2014 - 2:59 pm
  • Bright Light Bright Light: Everything I Ever WantedNovember 26, 2014 - 11:15 am
  • Jaime Nanci And The Blueboys: ‘Toy’ TalkNovember 25, 2014 - 4:09 pm

About Polari Magazine

Polari Magazine is an LGBT arts and culture magazine that explores the subculture by looking at what is important to the people who are in it. It’s about the lives we lead, not the lifestyles we’re supposed to lead.

Its content is informed & insightful, and features a diverse range of writers from every section of the community. Its intent is to help LGBT readers learn about their own heritage and to sustain a link between the present and the past.

Polari is designed to nurture the idea of community, whether that be social and political, or artistic and creative. It is your magazine, whether you want to read it, or whether you want to get involved in it, if you're gay, lesbian, bisexual, trans, or queer.

Polari Magazine is all these: it's a gay online magazine; it's a gay and lesbian online magazine; it's an LGBT arts and culture magazine. Ultimately, it is a queer magazine.

Latest Posts

  • Polari Magazine 2008-2014December 3, 2014 - 6:16 pm
  • Tearing Up Their Map: An Interview with LambDecember 2, 2014 - 2:45 pm
  • Future Islands • GigDecember 2, 2014 - 1:41 pm
  • Puppets with Attitude (at Christmas)December 1, 2014 - 6:30 pm
  • The Aesthetic of Voyeurism: Interview with Antonio Da SilvaDecember 1, 2014 - 1:25 pm
  • Broke With Expensive Taste • Azealia BanksNovember 28, 2014 - 3:59 pm
  • Royalty Strutting on an American College Stage: Miss and Mr. Gay ISU 2014November 27, 2014 - 2:59 pm
  • Bright Light Bright Light: Everything I Ever WantedNovember 26, 2014 - 11:15 am
  • Jaime Nanci And The Blueboys: ‘Toy’ TalkNovember 25, 2014 - 4:09 pm

Twitter

Tweets by @PolariMagazine

Archive

  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
© Copyright - Polari Magazine - Wordpress Theme by Kriesi.at
  • scroll to top
  • Send us Mail
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Join our Facebook Group
  • Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Website Privacy & Cookies