• Send us Mail
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Join our Facebook Group
  • Subscribe to our RSS Feed
  • Search Site

Polari Magazine

  • Home
  • Up Front
    • Editorial
    • Clementine: The Living Fashion Doll
    • Polari Safari
    • WTF? Friday
    • Bulletin Board
    • Polari Facts
  • Features
    • Interviews
    • Features
    • Gallery
    • Opinion
    • Heroes & Villains
  • Community
    • Oral Histories
    • Coming Out Stories
    • Relationships
    • IDAHO
    • LGBT History Month
    • Blogs
  • Reviews
    • Books
    • Film and Television
    • Music
    • Stage
    • Visual Arts
    • Classics: Books
    • Classics: Film and Television
    • Classics: Music
  • About
    • About Polari Magazine
    • Contributors
    • Contact

You are here: Polari Magazine / Film & Television / Star Trek • Dir: JJ Abrams

Star Trek • Dir: JJ Abrams

09 May 2009 / Comments Off / in Film & Television/by Christopher Bryant

Star Trek   ★★★★★
Dir: JJ Abrams
Cert: 12A • US: 126 min • Paramount / Spyglass / Bad Robot • In Theatres
………………………………………………………………………………………….

From the opening frames, JJ Abrams’ visionary reinterpretation of Star Trek grips on a visual, emotional and narrative level and it does not let up for a second. It is fast, loud, and designed to shake the audience to its core. “Forget everything you know, let’s start over,” Abrams has said of his version of Star Trek. That line would no doubt unsettle the fan base, although I think the term ‘audience’ would be more accurate: viewers of Star Trek are of greater number than the vocal few who treat it as a sacred object. Abrams achieves this feat through a plot device that creates an alternate universe. The result is that the events occur on a different timeline. This changes the underlying scenario of the Trek universe and enables it to start over. It is this audacity that is the key to Abrams’ achievement with this remarkable motion picture.

The events that bring about this alteration occur in an action sequence that is nothing less than a visual symphony. The action is so thick and fast that it is almost impossible to isolate the constituent elements. The captain of the USS Kelvin Richard Robau, (Faran Tahir), boards the Romulan vessel that has all but crippled his starship. Before doing so he hands his captainship to George Samuel Kirk (Chris Hemsworth).The Romulan captain Nero (Eric Bana) demands that Robau reveal the whereabouts of Ambassador Spock, of whom Robau knows nothing. The first suggestion that the ship is out of its time is when Nero asks what the stardate is. He then kills Robau and opens fire on the Kelvin.

What follows is nothing less than astounding. It is a superlative example of the power of cinema at its greatest. The birth of James Tiberius Kirk (Chris Pine) in the midst of this attack, and the sacrifice of George Samuel Kirk to save his crew, his wife and his newborn son, adds an emotional depth to an action sequence that is already overwhelming. When the title appears the audience has been truly shaken and prepared for the idea that nothing in the history of Star Trek could have prepared them for this experience.

What Abrams does not “forget” – and this is the reason that his reinterpretation is an unqualified success – is that the most important element of the Trek universe is the characters. This is a film driven by character more than it is driven by story. The story is in the characters and what brings them together. I admit that when, after the first great action sequence, scenes from the youth of Kirk and Spock (Zachary Quinto) became the subject, that I prepared for a little necessary boredom in the set-up and exposition segment. I could not have been more wrong. These moments are essential to the two characters and introduce the wonder of the recreated Trek universe. The film shifts gear when Kirk and Spock come into conflict over the infamous Kobayashi Maru scenario, Starfleet Academy’s no-win simulation. Kirk tricks his way into winning by reprogramming the test. This classic piece of Trek lore, first referenced in The Wrath of Khan, has never been put on film. The story then vaults straight into the main action with the reappearance of Nero once the back-story of the conflict between the two key characters has been established.

As the events fall into place, and the allusions to the classic Trek world are established within a new context, the point of this re-envisioning is clear. “At a certain point it seems like Star Trek stopped trying to reach a larger audience,” JJ Abrams has said. “This movie is not meant to be a continuum of that mode of thinking.” Abrams had already proved his metal by delivering Mission Impossible III. His task was now to resurrect an idea that had started to falter.

Following the failure of the rather uninspired Star Trek: Nemesis, and the cancellation of the TV series Enterprise, the copyright owners went into Franchise Panic. After all, Star Trek had morphed from political allegory into big-bucks product by the 1990s. What Abrams has done is to bring it into line with the trends in ‘00s television and film entertainment. Dark, and more challenging three-dimensional characters are the key: witness the new Battlestar Galactica, and Daniel Craig’s Bond. This is everything the antiseptic Star Trek franchise was not.

Jane Espenson, a writer and producer on Battlestar Galactica, has commented that Sci-Fi “sometimes seems to have hard time finding new fans, perhaps because they shrink from the ‘nerd’ perception.” And there is that word again. Fans. Writers, actors and producers talk about the fans as if they are the primary ones who need to be catered to. It is the audience who needs to be addressed, and this is what Abrams understands.

It only remains to say that Abrams’ Star Trek is truly a motion picture event, and for that reason it stands out in the fast-food culture of the ‘00s. Go watch it. And prepare to be stunned.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
Tags: battlestar galactica, chris pine, enterprise, eric bana, james tiberius kirk, jane espenson, jj abrams, star trek, zachary quinto

Related Posts

Did you like this entry?
Here are a few more posts that might be interesting for you.
Related Posts
Buffy the Vampire Slayer Volume 5: Predators and P...
History Month Heroes 15 – 21
Firefly: The Complete Series (2002)
Religion, Politics and Sex
GI Joe: The Rise of COBRA
You typed ‘are camp men gay’ into Goog...
LGBT Heroes – Day 20
Polari HQ • What are we watching?
LGBT Heroes – Day 2

Search Polari

Latest Posts

  • Polari Magazine 2008-2014December 3, 2014 - 6:16 pm
  • Tearing Up Their Map: An Interview with LambDecember 2, 2014 - 2:45 pm
  • Future Islands • GigDecember 2, 2014 - 1:41 pm
  • Puppets with Attitude (at Christmas)December 1, 2014 - 6:30 pm
  • The Aesthetic of Voyeurism: Interview with Antonio Da SilvaDecember 1, 2014 - 1:25 pm
  • Broke With Expensive Taste • Azealia BanksNovember 28, 2014 - 3:59 pm
  • Royalty Strutting on an American College Stage: Miss and Mr. Gay ISU 2014November 27, 2014 - 2:59 pm
  • Bright Light Bright Light: Everything I Ever WantedNovember 26, 2014 - 11:15 am
  • Jaime Nanci And The Blueboys: ‘Toy’ TalkNovember 25, 2014 - 4:09 pm

About Polari Magazine

Polari Magazine is an LGBT arts and culture magazine that explores the subculture by looking at what is important to the people who are in it. It’s about the lives we lead, not the lifestyles we’re supposed to lead.

Its content is informed & insightful, and features a diverse range of writers from every section of the community. Its intent is to help LGBT readers learn about their own heritage and to sustain a link between the present and the past.

Polari is designed to nurture the idea of community, whether that be social and political, or artistic and creative. It is your magazine, whether you want to read it, or whether you want to get involved in it, if you're gay, lesbian, bisexual, trans, or queer.

Polari Magazine is all these: it's a gay online magazine; it's a gay and lesbian online magazine; it's an LGBT arts and culture magazine. Ultimately, it is a queer magazine.

Latest Posts

  • Polari Magazine 2008-2014December 3, 2014 - 6:16 pm
  • Tearing Up Their Map: An Interview with LambDecember 2, 2014 - 2:45 pm
  • Future Islands • GigDecember 2, 2014 - 1:41 pm
  • Puppets with Attitude (at Christmas)December 1, 2014 - 6:30 pm
  • The Aesthetic of Voyeurism: Interview with Antonio Da SilvaDecember 1, 2014 - 1:25 pm
  • Broke With Expensive Taste • Azealia BanksNovember 28, 2014 - 3:59 pm
  • Royalty Strutting on an American College Stage: Miss and Mr. Gay ISU 2014November 27, 2014 - 2:59 pm
  • Bright Light Bright Light: Everything I Ever WantedNovember 26, 2014 - 11:15 am
  • Jaime Nanci And The Blueboys: ‘Toy’ TalkNovember 25, 2014 - 4:09 pm

Twitter

Tweets by @PolariMagazine

Archive

  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
© Copyright - Polari Magazine - Wordpress Theme by Kriesi.at
  • scroll to top
  • Send us Mail
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Join our Facebook Group
  • Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Website Privacy & Cookies